re:You be the judge - 2007/02/23 06:00Double should'nt have been my first choice (3c) but it is not a terrible bid IMO. 4s is indeed a bad bid with AQxx of hearts & a side queen & only four spades, the Law and common sense can be used to decide that passing 4hx is a better option than bidding 4s. If pd has a heart void and good values you have 0 offensive to bid 4s and will likely end up in a disaster because if pd has the right cards to win 4s his next bid won't be pass. 5s is also a bad bid, 4nt RKCB seems to be a better option
IMO South made two very doubtful bids (x,5s) while north made a really ugly bid (4s). North 65% of the blame South 35% of the blame
re:You be the judge - 2007/02/24 08:29If N/S agree which South's hand should double 2S, then 100% N (4S) Otherwise: 100% South (Double) 200% South (5S)
Remember, from North's point of view, 4S will probably make on the perfectly expected heart lead, with E/W makin 7+trikcs in hearts.
re:You be the judge - 2007/02/24 18:03Biddin 4S with the north hand is a crime. 5S is too much, when partner can only have four spades. 4H gotten you fixed. Stay fixed.
post new topic
